Cawley v. Dell Financial Services LLC
| Sherry Cawley |
| Dell Financial Services LLC |
| 2:2020cv02313 |
| June 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 7/15/2021. (vdru, )
|
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Dell Financial Services LLC.(Palmer, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/26/2020, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 11/9/2020, Rule 26 Report due by 11/9/2020, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/4/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/4/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/2/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/2/2021, Discovery due by 4/5/2021, Motion in Limine due by 7/13/2021, Motions due by 4/19/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 7/2/2021, Pretrial Briefs due by 7/27/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 8/3/2021, Mediation Due by 6/17/2021. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 10/6/2020. (vdru, ) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sherry Cawley.(Ball, Mark) |
| Filing 7 REPLY by Dell Financial Services LLC Defendant's Statement Concerning Removal. (Palmer, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Dell Financial Services LLC. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 7/10/2020. (vdru, )
|
| Filing 5 Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Counterclaim ANSWER to Counterclaim #4 by Sherry Cawley.(Ball, Mark) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , COUNTERCLAIM against Sherry Cawley by Dell Financial Services LLC. (Palmer, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Dell Financial Services LLC.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Colleton County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-15-56. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9166166), filed by Dell Financial Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Order Granting More Definite Statement, #3 Amended Summons & Complaint, #4 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cawley v. Dell Financial Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dell Financial Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth J Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherry Cawley | |
| Represented By: | Mark David Ball |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
