Nesmith v. Family Dollar Inc.
| Wendy Nesmith |
| Family Dollar Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02510 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 203 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Setting deadlines- Limited Discovery due by 09/24/2020, Status update due by 09/30/2020. Motion to stay #4 held in abeyance. Further details set forth in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/24/2020. (cpeg, )
|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Binding Arbitration Response filed by Family Dollar Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Vincent Votta)(Henthorne, D) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Reply Response to motion to stay due August 10, 2020. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/30/2020.(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to file Reply by Family Dollar Inc.. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email from Plaintiff consenting to extension)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Henthorne, D) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Binding Arbitration Response filed by Wendy Nesmith.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/30/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Ricker, Brice) |
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry. Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker no longer assigned to the case. (suro, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Binding Arbitration by Family Dollar Inc.. Response to Motion due by 7/23/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims)No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Henthorne, D) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Family Dollar Inc..(hada, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dorchester County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020CP1800858. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9194365), filed by Family Dollar Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nesmith v. Family Dollar Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wendy Nesmith | |
| Represented By: | Brice E Ricker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Family Dollar Inc. | |
| Represented By: | D Michael Henthorne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
