Bennett v. Smoke on the Creek LLC et al
| Monica Bennett |
| Smoke on the Creek LLC and Peter Woodman |
| 2:2020cv03610 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time: It is ordered that the time for Defendants to move, plead,or otherwise file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to December 21, 2020. Entered at the Direction of The Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 11/30/2020.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Move, Plead, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Smoke on the Creek LLC, Peter Woodman. Response to Motion due by 12/7/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Spence, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Peter Woodman. (vdru, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Smoke on the Creek LLC. (vdru, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Monica Bennett.(vdru, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Smoke on the Creek LLC, Peter Woodman ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9408079.), filed by Monica Bennett. Service due by 1/13/2021. (vdru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
