BPG v. Old Navy LLC
| BPG |
| Old Navy LLC doing business as Old Navy Stores |
| 2:2020cv03716 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 5/10/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 6/14/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 7/15/2021, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 11/18/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 2/28/2022, ADR Statement due by 11/29/2021, Mediation Due by 12/29/2021. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/12/2021. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting #8 Motion for Confidentiality Order Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/12/2021.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Old Navy LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/25/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Confidentiality Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Holt, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Old Navy LLC.(Holt, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by BPG.(Connell, Gene) |
| Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/18/2020, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/11/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 1/11/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/8/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/15/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/16/2021, Discovery due by 8/6/2021, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 8/20/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 10/1/2021, ADR Statement due by 8/31/2021, Mediation Due by 9/30/2021, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 11/3/2020. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Old Navy LLC.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Old Navy LLC. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Georgetown County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-22-00779. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9425816), filed by Old Navy LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BPG v. Old Navy LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Old Navy LLC doing business as Old Navy Stores | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Charles Holt |
| Represented By: | Mark Steven Barrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BPG | |
| Represented By: | Gene McCain Connell, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
