Allen v. Argos USA
| Wade Allen |
| Argos USA |
| 2:2020cv03972 |
| November 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/16/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/11/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 2/11/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/8/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/16/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/20/2021, Discovery due by 12/3/2021, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 12/10/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 2/7/2022, ADR Statement due by 11/17/2021, Mediation Due by 12/17/2021, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/8/2021. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/8/2021. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 9
Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Argos USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Horton, Greg)
|
|
Filing 7
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wade Allen. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service 26.01 Answers)(Franklin, Ivey)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Ivey Blaire Franklin on behalf of Wade Allen (Franklin, Ivey)
|
|
Filing 5
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/16/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 2/11/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 2/11/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/8/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/15/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/17/2021, Discovery due by 9/4/2021, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 9/20/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 11/1/2021, ADR Statement due by 10/1/2021, Mediation Due by 10/31/2021, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/2/2020. (jbry, )
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Argos USA.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Argos USA. (sshe, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dorchester County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-18-01676. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9471868), filed by Argos USA. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(sshe, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Argos USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Argos USA | |
| Represented By: | Greg Horton |
| Represented By: | Robert Andrew Walden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wade Allen | |
| Represented By: | Catherine Frances Juhas |
| Represented By: | Ivey Blaire Franklin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
