Washington v. Uebel et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Washington
Defendant: Otis Timmons and Stephen L Uebel
Case Number: 2:2020cv03990
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Timothy M Cain
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Deadline to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report, Joint Discovery Plan and Joint Rule 26.03 Disclosures is 01/21/2021. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 01/05/2021.(hada, )
January 4, 2021 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by Otis Timmons, Stephen L Uebel. Response to Motion due by 1/19/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Kozacki, J)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/29/2020, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/7/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 1/7/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/1/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/31/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/31/2021, Discovery due by 6/1/2021, Motions due by 8/2/2021, Mediation Due by 7/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 12/03/2020. (hada, )
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Otis Timmons, Stephen L Uebel.(Kozacki, J)
December 2, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Otis Timmons, Stephen L Uebel.(Kozacki, J)
November 24, 2020 Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Shawn Washington. All Defendants. Served on 11/20/2020, Answer due by 12/11/2020. (Langley, Timothy) Modified docket text to add answer deadline on 11/30/2020 (hada, ).
November 16, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Otis Timmons, Stephen L Uebel. Service due by 2/16/2021 (hada, )
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Shawn Washington.(hada, )
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Otis Timmons, Stephen L Uebel ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9473106.), filed by Shawn Washington. Service due by 2/16/2021(hada, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Uebel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Washington
Represented By: Timothy Ryan Langley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Otis Timmons
Represented By: J Scott Kozacki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen L Uebel
Represented By: J Scott Kozacki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?