Fields v. Stich et al
Plaintiff: Tracie Fields
Defendant: Thomas Joseph Stich, Jr and United States of America
Case Number: 2:2020cv04484
Filed: December 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 2/1/2021. (jbry, )
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Substitute Party. Thomas Joseph Stich, Jr terminated and the United States of America is substituted as the party defendant. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/15/2021.(jbry, )
January 4, 2021 Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/16/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/11/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 3/11/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/8/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/14/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/15/2021, Discovery due by 10/4/2021, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 10/20/2021, Bench Trial Deadline 12/2/2021, ADR Statement due by 10/29/2021, Mediation Due by 11/30/2021, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 1/4/2021.(jbry, )
December 29, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Party United States of America's Motion to Substitute Party Defendant; 28 U.S.C.2679(d)(2) by United States of America. Response to Motion due by 1/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(sshe, )
December 29, 2020 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by United States of America.(sshe, )
December 29, 2020 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Thomas Joseph Stich, Jr. (sshe, )
December 29, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-10-04699., filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(sshe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. Stich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Joseph Stich, Jr
Represented By: Anthony W Livoti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Lee Ellis Berlinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracie Fields
Represented By: Matthew E Yelverton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?