Sterner v. Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department et al
| Rebecca Sterner |
| Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Steve Varlas, Gary Melton and Robert Maibach |
| 2:2021cv00009 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Joseph Dawson |
| David C Norton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas.(Foster, William) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/1/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Foster, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Victoria Latrice Hurse on behalf of Rebecca Sterner (Hurse, Victoria) (Main Document 12 replaced on 2/16/2021) (rweb, ). Modified on 2/16/2021 to correct case number on document as verified by filing user (rweb, ). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Katie Elizabeth Towery on behalf of Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas (Towery, Katie) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Rebecca Sterner. Response to Motion due by 2/18/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Cobb, Hal) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Answer is due 02/22/2021. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/01/2021.(hada, ) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas. Response to Motion due by 2/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Foster, William) |
| Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Joseph Dawson, III. Judge Honorable David C Norton no longer assigned to the case. (glev, ) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' response due 2/1/2021. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 1/8/2021.(hada, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Goose Creek Rural Volunteer Fire Department, Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas. Response to Motion due by 1/20/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Foster, William) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Robert Maibach, Gary Melton, Steve Varlas.(hada, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Berkeley County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020CP0802443. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9565332), filed by Steve Varlas, Gary Melton, Robert Maibach. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Notice to State Court)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
