Borough of Point Pleasant New Jersey v. 3M Company, The et al
Borough of Point Pleasant New Jersey |
DuPont de Nemours Inc, 3M Company, The, Chemours Company FC LLC, The, Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, John Doe Defendants 1-49, Chemours Company, The, Dowdupont Inc, National Foam Inc, Kidde-Fenwal Inc, Arkema Inc, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP, EI Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Clariant Corporation, Corteva Inc and Chemguard Inc |
2:2021cv00357 |
February 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MDL MEMBER CASE OPENED: (Direct-filed), Borough of Point Pleasant New Jersey v. 3M et al, as DSC case 2:21-cv-357-RMG Plaintiff Home Venue: New Jersey (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9630984.), filed by Borough of Point Pleasant New Jersey. Service due by 5/5/2021(sshe, )(Main Document 1 replaced on 2/5/2021) (sshe, ). Modified on 2/5/2021 to replace with corrected document (to state "home venue" pursuant to CMO No 3) provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.