Kelton et al v. United States of America, The et al
| George Kelton and Georgia Kelton |
| Schindler Elevator Corp, American Elevator Co Inc and United States of America, The |
| 2:2021cv00371 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1346 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by United States of America, The.(Bowens, Barbara) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by United States of America, The.(Bowens, Barbara) |
| Filing 17 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by American Elevator Co Inc. Attachment from entry #16 removed and filed separately.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 16 American Elevator's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by American Elevator Co Inc. (Attachments: # 1 LR 26.01 Answers)(Payne, Danielle) Modified on 4/5/2021 to remove attachment and file separately as entry #17 (jbry, ). |
| Filing 15 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/14/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/4/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 6/4/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/6/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/13/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/14/2021, Discovery due by 1/3/2022, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 1/18/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 3/1/2022, ADR Statement due by 1/29/2022, Mediation Due by 2/28/2022, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 4/2/2021. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Schindler Elevator Corp.(Highfield, Duke) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Schindler Elevator Corp.(Highfield, Duke) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint Schindler Elevator Corp answer due 3/22/2021. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 3/4/2021.(jbry, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Schindler Elevator Corp. Response to Motion due by 3/17/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E-mail with consent)No proposed order.(Highfield, Duke) |
| Filing 9 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER American Elevator Co Inc answer due 4/5/2021. (Payne, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Georgia Kelton, George Kelton. American Elevator Co Inc served on 2/11/2021, answer due 3/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit American Elevator Co., Inc., #2 Certificate of Service)(Johnson, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Barbara Murcier Bowens on behalf of United States of America, The (Bowens, Barbara) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Georgia Kelton, George Kelton. Schindler Elevator Corp served on 2/8/2021, answer due 3/1/2021. Refiled to correct event type and to replace document with corrected signature as provided by filing user. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United States of America, The. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to American Elevator Co Inc, Schindler Elevator Corp. (jbry, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by George Kelton, Georgia Kelton.(jbry, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9633050.), filed by Georgia Kelton, George Kelton. Service due by 5/6/2021(jbry, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
