Wideman v. Sink, Sr. et al
| Charles Wideman |
| George Sink, Sr. and Robert E Treacy, Jr. |
| 2:2021cv00482 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Richard M Gergel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Summons Issued, #7 Order Service and required documents placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Charles Wideman 114 North Pond Court Greenwood, SC 29649 (hada, )
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to George Sink, Sr., Robert E Treacy, Jr.. Service due by 6/28/2021. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 03/30/2021. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 5
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Wideman. (Note: Page 1 was all that was received by the Clerk's office). (hada, )
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Charles Wideman. (hada, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against George Sink, Sr., Robert E Treacy, Jr. (Filing fee $ 402. Receipt No. SCX600008812), filed by Charles Wideman. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(hada, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
