DR Horton Inc v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al
DR Horton Inc |
Builders Mutual Insurance Company, Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Ohio Security Insurance Company |
2:2021cv00643 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Builders Mutual Insurance Company.(Malone, John) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Builders Mutual Insurance Company.(Malone, John) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by John Irvin Malone, Jr on behalf of Builders Mutual Insurance Company (Malone, John) |
Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company.(Malone, John) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company.(Malone, John) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John Irvin Malone, Jr on behalf of Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Malone, John) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 4/22/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 5/6/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 5/6/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/30/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/30/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/30/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/7/2021, Discovery due by 9/28/2021, Motion in Limine due by 15 business days prior to jury selection, Motions due by 10/12/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to jury selection, Case ready for jury selection and/or trial on or after 1/1/2022 Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/1/2021. (sshe, ) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ohio Security Insurance Company, erroneously sued and served as by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 LR 26.01 Answers)(Templeton, Morgan) |
Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by DR Horton Inc. from SC Department of Insurance on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. (Plyler, Ross) (Main Document 7 replaced on 3/16/2021) (sshe, ). Modified on 3/16/2021 to replace with corrected signature document provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by DR Horton Inc. from SC Department of Insurance on behalf of Builders Mutual Insurance Company served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. (Plyler, Ross) (Main Document 6 replaced on 3/16/2021) (sshe, ). Modified on 3/16/2021 to replace with corrected signature document provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by DR Horton Inc. from SC Department of Insurance on behalf of Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company served on 3/10/2021, answer due 3/31/2021. (Plyler, Ross) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/16/2021) (sshe, ). Modified on 3/16/2021 to replace with corrected signature document provided by filing user(sshe, ). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by DR Horton Inc.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9691852.), filed by DR Horton Inc. Service due by 6/3/2021(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.