Burns v. Crawford Steel Corporation et al
Christopher Burns |
Crawford Steel Corporation, Alliked Crawford Charleston Inc and Allied Crawford Charleston Inc |
2:2021cv00797 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Kevin McDonald |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 6 Reason: Duplicate of entry 5 Modified filing date to that of original filing: 4/24/2021 Response due date modified to that of original filing: n/a (kric, ) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Christopher Burns. Alliked Crawford Charleston Inc waiver executed on 3/19/2021, answer due 5/18/2021. (Nauheim, David) (Main Document 5 replaced on 5/4/2021 as provided by filer) (kric, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/4/2021 as provided by filer: #1 waiver of service) (kric, ). Modified on 5/4/2021 to edit text (kric, ). |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Christopher Burns.(kric, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alliked Crawford Charleston Inc, Crawford Steel Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9720293.), filed by Christopher Burns. Service due by 6/17/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Email from Tonya Burns, #2 Exhibit B Charge of Discrimination, #3 Exhibit C Notice or Right to Sue)(kric, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.