Pilcher v. Nelson et al
Eddie Pilcher |
Lt. Levels, Jr, Sgt. Coaxum, Major A. Thomas, SCDC, Warden Nelson and Agent Martin |
2:2021cv00843 |
March 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
David C Norton |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Summons Issued as to Sgt. Coaxum. Service due by 8/2/2021 (hcor, ) |
Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #16 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Eddie Pilcher 303616 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 136 Wilburn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (hcor, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 05/03/2021. (hcor, ) |
Filing 15 Letter from Eddie Pilcher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hcor, ) |
Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 12 Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Eddie Pilcher 303616 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 136 Wilburn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (hcor, ) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER re #11 Letter. Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court on April 22, 2021, claiming that prison officials are retaliating against him for filing the instant lawsuit. Specifically, Plaintiff claims that he was recently removed from protective custody without explanation, despite alleged concerns for Plaintiff's safety around other inmates. Generally, the Court cannot interfere with the day-to-day management of a prison. See Washington v. Rounds, No. PWG-16-320, 2017 WL 5668216, at *3 (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2017) (explaining that day- to-day administrative decisions are peculiarly within the province and professional expertise of corrections officials). However, to the extent Plaintiff believes his civil rights are being violated and wishes to proceed with legal action, the undersigned has enclosed a blank Prisoner Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights for Plaintiff's use. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 04/23/2021. (hcor, ) |
Filing 11 Letter from Eddie Pilcher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hcor, ) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Sgt. Coaxum, Lt. Levels, Jr, Agent Martin, Warden Nelson, SCDC, Major A. Thomas. Service due by 7/14/2021 (hada, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Eddie Pilcher 303616 Lieber Correctional Institution P.O. Box 205 136 Wilburn Avenue Ridgeville, SC 29472 (hada, ) |
Filing 7 REFERENCE #6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 04/15/2021.(hada, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 04/15/2021. (hada, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Eddie Pilcher. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(hada, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sgt. Coaxum, Lt. Levels, Jr, Agent Martin, Warden Nelson, SCDC, Major A. Thomas, filed by Eddie Pilcher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hada, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.