Getaneh v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce et al
| Solomon Adam Getaneh |
| John Does 1-10 and South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce |
| 2:2021cv00979 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Proper Form Order with required documents, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Solomon Adam Getaneh 9761 Roseberry Street Ladson, SC 29456 (cpeg, ) |
Filing 7
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 6/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 05/11/2021. (cpeg, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Solomon Adam Getaneh. Response to Motion due by 4/16/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-10, South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, filed by Solomon Adam Getaneh. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(cpeg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
