Gadson v. Volvo Car USA, LLC
Nicole Gadson |
Volvo Car USA, LLC |
2:2021cv00985 |
April 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
David C Norton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 6/16/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/30/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 6/30/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/21/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/20/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/20/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/20/2021, Discovery due by 11/19/2021, Motions due by 1/18/2022, Mediation Due by 12/20/2021, This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 5/26/2021. (sgri) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint, by Volvo Car USA, LLC.(Duda, William) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Volvo Car USA, LLC, filed by Nicole Gadson. Service due by 7/19/2021 (Hunt, Bonnie) (Main Document 10 replaced provided by filing user on 4/21/2021) (sgri). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/21/2021: #1 Right to Sue to 695, #2 Right to Sue 752, #3 Charge of Discrimination 752) (sgri). |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER finding as moot #8 motion to amend/correct Complaint. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint as a matter of course pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 4/19/2021.(kric, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Nicole Gadson. Response to Motion due by 5/3/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Amended complaint)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Hunt, Bonnie) |
Filing 7 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Volvo Car USA, LLC answer due 5/25/2021. (Duda, William) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Volvo Car USA, LLC. (sgri) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nicole Gadson. (sgri) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Volvo Car USA, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9752110.), filed by Nicole Gadson. Service due by 7/6/2021 (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gadson v. Volvo Car USA, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicole Gadson | |
Represented By: | Bonnie Travaglio Hunt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Volvo Car USA, LLC | |
Represented By: | William L Duda |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.