Aqua New Jersey Inc v. Tyco Fire Products LP et al
AQUA NEW JERSEY, INC., |
The 3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Dynax Corporation, The Chemours Company FC, L.L.C., E I DuPont De Nemours Company Inc, Deepwater Chemicals Inc, National Foam Inc, Arkema Inc, ChemDesign Products Inc, Clariant Corporation, Corteva Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, BASF Corporation, Doe Defendants 1-20, Chemguard Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP, Nation Ford Chemical Company, The Chemours Company, Kidde-Fenwal Inc, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemicals Inc, Archroma Management LLC, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. |
2:2021cv01265 |
April 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 STATUS REPORT - Defendant BASF Corporation's General Denial and Preliminary Statement of Affirmative Defenses by BASF Corp, BASF Corporation, BASF Corporation, BASF Corporation, BASF Corporation, BASF Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:18-mn-02873-RMG et al.(Holian, Matthew) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 7 MDL MEMBER CASE OPENED: New Jersey, 3:21-cv-09587, Aqua New Jersey Inc v. Tyco Fire Products LP et al, as DSC case 2:21-cv-1265-RMG (sshe, ) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of New Jersey; Case Number 3:21-cv-09587. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 Order of MDL Panel (CTO-51) transferring case to the USDC for the SCD. (dm ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Filing 3 ORDER SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC INITIAL CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference, initiated by Plaintiffs counsel, set for 6/2/2021 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 4/26/2021. (jem) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CHEMGUARD, INC., TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Thomas J. Herten, Esq. in Support of Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond, #2 Exhibit A - Notice of Potential Tag-Along and Docket Sheet, #3 Brief Memo of Law in Support Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #5 Certification Proof of Service)(HERTEN, THOMAS) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . Motion set for 5/17/2021 before Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jmh) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi added. (jal, ) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, CHEMGUARD, INC. from Superior Court of New Jersey, Mercer County, case number MER-L-000575-21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12381519), filed by TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, CHEMGUARD, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet with Riders, #2 Certificate of Service Proof of Service)(HERTEN, THOMAS) [Transferred from New Jersey on 4/29/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.