Wiggins v. Charleston County et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Wiggins
Defendant: Barrett Tolbert and Charleston County
Case Number: 2:2021cv01958
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Molly H Cherry
Referring Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Filing 21 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Barrett Tolbert.(Fletcher, John)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 CONSENT AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/5/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 2/4/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/7/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/6/2022, Discovery due by 5/6/2022, Motions due by 7/11/2022, Mediation Due by 6/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/24/2021. (cpeg, )
August 24, 2021 Filing 19 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Kenneth Wiggins.(Hunt, Bonnie)
August 24, 2021 Filing 18 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Charleston County.(Conley, Bob)
August 24, 2021 Filing 17 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Charleston County. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Conley, Bob)
August 19, 2021 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER re ECF No. #15 Request for Protection from Court Appearance. The undersigned grants protection to Attorney Bonnie Travaglio Hunt for January 14, 2022 to January 24, 2022. This Order does not afford protection from any appearance required before the District Court Judge assigned to this case, although the District Court Judge may separately grant such protection. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/19/2021.(cpeg, )
August 18, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Bonnie Travaglio Hunt for January 14, 2022 to January 24, 2022 (Hunt, Bonnie) Modified on 8/19/2021 to update event type (cpeg, ).
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 8/10/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 8/24/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 8/24/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/14/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/14/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/15/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/14/2022, Discovery due by 1/14/2022, Motions due by 3/16/2022, Mediation Due by 2/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/20/2021. (hcor, )
July 19, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Charleston County.(Conley, Bob)
July 16, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Barrett Tolbert.(Fletcher, John)
July 7, 2021 Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kenneth Wiggins. Service due by 10/5/2021 (Hunt, Bonnie)
July 7, 2021 Filing 8 Text Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 7). Leave to amend a complaint should be "freely" given "when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2); see Foreman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962); Johnson v. Oroweat Foods Co., 785 F.2d 503, 509 (4th Cir. 1986). Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is hereby granted. Plaintiff has 7 days from the date of this Order to file the Amended Complaint. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 07/07/2021.(cpeg, )
July 6, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Kenneth Wiggins. Response to Motion due by 7/20/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Hunt, Bonnie)
July 2, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT TO REMOVAL FROM STATE COURT by Barrett Tolbert. (Attachments: #1 LR 26.01 Answers)(Fletcher, John)
July 1, 2021 Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kenneth Wiggins.(Hunt, Bonnie)
June 30, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Charleston County. (hcor, )
June 30, 2021 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charleston County.(hcor, )
June 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021CP1002321. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9934114), filed by Charleston County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wiggins v. Charleston County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barrett Tolbert
Represented By: John William Fletcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charleston County
Represented By: Bob J Conley
Represented By: Caroline Wrenn Cleveland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Wiggins
Represented By: Bonnie Travaglio Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?