Pickett v. Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646
| Jill Pickett |
| Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646 |
| 2:2021cv02207 |
| July 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #10 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court, to Clerk of Court, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, ***DOCUMENT MAILED Certified Filed copy of #10 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Clerk of Court, Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 100 Broad St Ste 106 Charleston, SC 29401-2210 (sshe, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER and OPINION: The consent motion to remand is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 8).The Court REMANDS this case to the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South Carolina. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/24/21.(ltap, ) Modified document type (Opinion) on 8/26/2021 (sshe, ).
|
|
Filing 8
DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 6 Reason: Attorney filing user refiled corrected document as correct event Corrected Filing Document Number #7 Modified filing date to that of original filing: 7/28/2021 (sshe, )
|
|
Filing 7
Consent MOTION to Remand to State Court by Jill Pickett. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Masty, Jay) Modified on 7/30/2021 to correct filing date (sshe, ).
|
|
Filing 5
Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646.(Weatherly, Lee)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing 2
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-10-02861. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9969781), filed by Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 - Notice to Plaintiff of Removal, #2 Exhibit A-2 - Notice to State Court of Removal, #3 State Court Documents)(sshe, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pickett v. Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jill Pickett | |
| Represented By: | Jay S Masty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Publix Super Markets Inc Store No 1646 | |
| Represented By: | Kierra N Brown |
| Represented By: | Lee Cannon Weatherly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
