Musallam v. Charleston County School District et al
Plaintiff: Zakariya-Shaith Musallam
Defendant: Charleston County School District, ., Dana Hancock Rodgers and Jennifer Coker
Case Number: 2:2021cv02414
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 9/14/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 9/28/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 9/28/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/19/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/18/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/20/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/20/2021, Discovery due by 2/28/2022, Motions due by 4/19/2022, Mediation Due by 3/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 08/24/2021. (hcor, )
August 23, 2021 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charleston County School District, Jennifer Coker, Dana Hancock Rodgers.(Matthews, Eugene)
August 23, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Charleston County School District, Jennifer Coker, Dana Hancock Rodgers.(Matthews, Eugene)
August 16, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Zakariya-Shaith Musallam. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Memo in Support)(Kobrovsky, Lawrence)
August 3, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Charleston County School District, Jennifer Coker, Dana Hancock Rodgers. Service due by 11/1/2021 (hcor, )
August 3, 2021 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Zakariya-Shaith Musallam.(hcor, )
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charleston County School District, Jennifer Coker, Dana Hancock Rodgers ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9994832.), filed by Zakariya-Shaith Musallam. Service due by 11/1/2021(hcor, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Musallam v. Charleston County School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zakariya-Shaith Musallam
Represented By: Lawrence Craig Kobrovsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charleston County School District, .
Represented By: Eugene H Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dana Hancock Rodgers
Represented By: Eugene H Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Coker
Represented By: Eugene H Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?