Grant v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Amy Grant
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc., Ralph Lauren Corporation and Susan Smith
Case Number: 2:2021cv02589
Filed: August 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Amy Grant. Response to Motion due by 9/27/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Traywick, Benjamin)
September 1, 2021 Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/13/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 11/8/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 11/8/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/10/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/14/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/15/2022, Discovery due by 6/6/2022, Motions in Limine due at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 6/20/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 8/1/2022, ADR Statement due by 7/1/2022, Mediation Due by 7/31/2022, Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 9/1/2021. (jbry, )
August 30, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc..(Cappelmann, Emily)
August 30, 2021 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Ralph Lauren Corporation.(Cappelmann, Emily)
August 12, 2021 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc..(hcor, )
August 12, 2021 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ralph Lauren Corporation.(hcor, )
August 12, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021CP1001694. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10013458), filed by Ralph Lauren Corporation, Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Affidavit)(hcor, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Grant
Represented By: Alexandra Scott Williams
Represented By: Benjamin Alexander Traywick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Represented By: Emily Kate Cappelmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ralph Lauren Corporation
Represented By: Emily Kate Cappelmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?