Hattan v. Volvo Car USA LLC
Saundra J Hattan |
Volvo Car USA LLC |
2:2021cv03519 |
October 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Volvo Car USA LLC. (Duda, William) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Saundra J Hattan.Reply to Response to Motion due by 12/20/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Murrell, J) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Volvo Car USA LLC. Response to Motion due by 12/13/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Duda, William) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Defendant Volvo Car USA, LLC moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. No. 3). The Court gave Plaintiff leave to amend the pleading to cure its purported defect or respond in opposition. (Dkt. No. 5). Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 6). Therefore, Defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as MOOT. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/12/21.(ltap, ) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT SECOND against Volvo Car USA LLC, filed by Saundra J Hattan. Service due by 2/9/2022 (Murrell, J) |
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 3). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file either an amended complaint or a response to the instant motion on or before November 12, 2021. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/8/21. (ltap, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Volvo Car USA LLC. Response to Motion due by 11/10/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Volvo Car USA LLC.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Berkeley County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-08-01984. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10150415), filed by Volvo Car USA LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hattan v. Volvo Car USA LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Saundra J Hattan | |
Represented By: | J David Murrell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Volvo Car USA LLC | |
Represented By: | Piper Reiff Byzet |
Represented By: | William L Duda |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.