Molina-Figueroa v. Warden Mackleberg
Carlos Estaban Molina-Figueroa |
Warden Mackleberg and Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield |
2:2021cv03681 |
November 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Joseph Dawson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #3 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, 5 Document Mailed. Unsigned/Undated. (dgar) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #3 Order 2241 Federal Habeas, 5 Document Mailed, served on Warden of Edgefield FCI (dgar) |
Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Order 2241 Federal Habeas. Copy of #1 and [1-1] Mailed to Respondent, along with copies sent certified to Attorney General of United States, and placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Carlos Estaban Molina-Figueroa 19901-081 FCI Edgefield PO Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824. (dgar) |
Filing 3 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Apprising the respondent of deadline of 3/2/2022 for filing dispositive motions and directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 12/14/2021. (dgar) Modified on 12/15/2021 to include deadline(dgar). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 Receipt number scx400015371.), filed by Carlos Estaban Molina-Figueroa. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(cpeg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.