Britt v. County of Charleston, The et al
Plaintiff: Tabitha Eileen Britt
Defendant: County of Charleston, The, David Abrams, Thomas "Chris&quo Esdorn, Gregory "Greg&quot Carney, David M French M.D., Thomas Esdorn and Gregory Carney
Case Number: 2:2021cv03770
Filed: November 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Gregory Carney.(Byrd, Lindsey).
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Gregory Carney.(Byrd, Lindsey).
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Gregory Carney. Response to Motion due by 1/26/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(Byrd, Lindsey).
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Thomas Esdorn answer due 1/18/2022. (Lindemann, Andrew)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Tabitha Eileen Britt. Gregory Carney served on 12/22/2021, answer due 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Def Carney AOS)(Cooper, Michael).
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Tabitha Eileen Britt. Thomas Esdorn served on 12/14/2021, answer due 1/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Def Esdorn AOS)(Cooper, Michael)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document #1 Notice of Removal,. First attachment description: First Amended Complaint . (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents First Amended Complaint)(Ganes, Elloree)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by David Abrams, County of Charleston, The, David M French M.D..(Ganes, Elloree)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by David Abrams, County of Charleston, The, David M French M.D..(hcor, )
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021CP1004778. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10193005), filed by David Abrams, David M French M.D., County of Charleston, The. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 State Court Notice, #3 Certificate of Service)(hcor, ) Modified on 12/1/2021 to reference #5 Additional Attachments (rshu, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Britt v. County of Charleston, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tabitha Eileen Britt
Represented By: James Kevin Holmes
Represented By: Michael T Cooper
Represented By: W Mullins McLeod, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Charleston, The
Represented By: Elloree A Ganes
Represented By: Evan Michael Sobocinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Abrams
Represented By: Elloree A Ganes
Represented By: Evan Michael Sobocinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas "Chris&quo Esdorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory "Greg&quot Carney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M French M.D.
Represented By: Elloree A Ganes
Represented By: Evan Michael Sobocinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Esdorn
Represented By: Andrew F Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Carney
Represented By: Amanda Kurzen Dudgeon
Represented By: Lindsey McClain Byrd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?