Mitchell v. NewRez, LLC
| David Mitchell and David Michel |
| NewRez, LLC |
| 2:2021cv03905 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by NewRez, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/11/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Koutrakos, Demetri) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Deposit Funds. Having considered the motion and stipulation, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the relief sought therein. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/26/22.(ltap, )
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Deposit Funds by David Michel. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Consent Order to Deposit Funds into Registry of Court)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Howe, Donald) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. No. 7). The Court gave Plaintiff leave to amend the pleading to cure its purported defects or to respond in opposition. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. Therefore, Defendants motion to dismiss the complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/19/22.(ltap, ) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against NewRez, LLC, filed by David Michel. Service due by 4/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (Howe, Donald) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file either an amended complaint or a response to the instant motion on or before January 17, 2022. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/9/22. (ltap, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by NewRez, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/21/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Koutrakos, Demetri) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Demetri K Koutrakos on behalf of NewRez, LLC (Koutrakos, Demetri) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT granting Defendant NewRez LLC's #4 Motion for Extension of Time until January 7, 2022 to file its answer or other response to the Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/8/2021.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by NewRez, LLC. Response to Motion due by 12/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Milam, G) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by NewRez, LLC. (adic, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Charleston County, South Carolina, case number 2021-CP-10-04865. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10212801). filed by NewRez, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Exhibits). (adic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
