Hoag v. Milhoan et al
Plaintiff: Daniella Hoag
Defendant: Stewart Milhoan, Michelle Milhoan and Joe Smith
Case Number: 2:2021cv03926
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2022 Filing 8 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Daniella Hoag.(Phipps, Edward)
December 29, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Michelle Milhoan, Stewart Milhoan, Joe Smith.Reply to Response to Motion due by 1/5/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit B - Stipulation Limiting Damage and Email)(LaFave, Mary)
December 9, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Daniella Hoag. Response to Motion due by 12/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letters, #2 Exhibit B - Redacted Emails)No proposed order.(Phipps, Edward)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Michelle Milhoan, Stewart Milhoan, and Joe Smith. (adic, )
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Michelle Milhoan, Stewart Milhoan, and Joe Smith. (adic, ). Modified on 12/3/2021 to add additional attachment(s) of #1 Defendants answers to complaints. (adic, )
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Court of Common Pleas, Ninth Judicial Circuit in Charleston County, South Carolina, case number 2021-CP-10-04363. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10217302). filed by Stewart Milhoan, Michelle Milhoan, and Joe Smith. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (adic, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoag v. Milhoan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniella Hoag
Represented By: Edward Lee Phipps
Represented By: Mark R.H. Huber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stewart Milhoan
Represented By: Mary Daniel LaFave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Milhoan
Represented By: Mary Daniel LaFave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Smith
Represented By: Mary Daniel LaFave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?