Wright v. Sanofi-Aventis US LLC et al
| Karen Yvette Wright |
| Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc, Chattem Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc |
| 2:2021cv04205 |
| December 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case transferred to Southern Florida per certified copy of Conditional Transfer Order Number 89. The Transferring Clerk's Office hereby attests the record and the docket sheet available through CM/ECF to be the certified list. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chattem Inc. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sanofi US Services Inc. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sanofi-Aventis US LLC. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Karen Yvette Wright.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10256891.), filed by Karen Yvette Wright. Service due by 3/31/2022(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
