Williams v. Samet Corporation
| Matthew Williams |
| Samet Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00037 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Matthew Williams (Arnold, Brian) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING - Changed to In-Person - Motion Hearing set for 3/21/2022 11:00 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (hcor, ) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.; granting #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 03/02/2022.(hcor, )
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by J. Nathan Duggins III ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10354749) by Samet Corporation. Response to Motion due by 3/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit A. Application/Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Supporting Documents B. Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.(Payne, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Daniel D. Stratton ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10354677) by Samet Corporation. Response to Motion due by 3/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit A. Application/Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Supporting Documents B. Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.(Payne, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Conference re #7 Motion to Dismiss set for 3/21/2022 11:00 AM before Honorable David C Norton. Call-in instructions will be distributed at a later date. (hcor, ) Modified to correct date on 2/11/2022 (hcor, ). |
| Filing 11 SUR REPLY to REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Response filed by Matthew Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supporting Opinion)(Arnold, Brian) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Support re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Response filed by Samet Corporation. (Payne, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Response filed by Matthew Williams.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/8/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Arnold, Brian) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER finding as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Entered at the direction of Honorable David C Norton on 01/19/2022.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Samet Corporation. Response to Motion due by 2/1/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint)No proposed order.(Payne, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Matthew Williams.(Arnold, Brian) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Samet Corporation, filed by Matthew Williams. Service due by 4/6/2022 (Arnold, Brian) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Samet Corporation. Response to Motion due by 1/20/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A. Offer letter)No proposed order.(Payne, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Samet Corporation.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021CP1005434. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10262024), filed by Samet Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Notice to State Court of Removal)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Samet Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Williams | |
| Represented By: | Brian E Arnold |
| Represented By: | Daniel D Stratton |
| Represented By: | J Nathan Duggins, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samet Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey L Payne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
