Boyd v. Giant Cement Holding, Inc.
| Melvin Lamonte Boyd |
| Giant Cement Holding, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00091 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/21/2022, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 5/23/2022, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/22/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/22/2022, Discovery due by 8/22/2022, Motions due by 10/21/2022, Mediation Due by 9/21/2022, Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 03/08/2022. (apsn)
|
|
Filing 11
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting #10 Consent MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Giant Cement Holding, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 03/08/2022. (apsn)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Giant Cement Holding, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 3/15/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed Confidentiality Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Glass, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Giant Cement Holding, Inc..(Glass, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Giant Cement Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Amended Consent Scheduling Order)(Glass, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's Answers to Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Melvin Lamonte Boyd.(Millender, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Melvin Lamonte Boyd.(Millender, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 5
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 2/15/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 3/1/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 3/1/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/22/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/21/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/23/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 7/22/2022, Motions due by 9/21/2022, Mediation Due by 8/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 01/25/2022. (egra, )
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Giant Cement Holding, Inc..(Glass, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boyd v. Giant Cement Holding, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Melvin Lamonte Boyd | |
| Represented By: | J. Paul Porter |
| Represented By: | James Paul Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Giant Cement Holding, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin P Glass |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
