Adair v. City of Goose Creek
Plaintiff: Warren J. Adair
Defendant: City of Goose Creek
Case Number: 2:2022cv00539
Filed: February 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2022 Filing 11 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by City of Goose Creek.(Thompson, Charles)
March 10, 2022 Filing 10 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Goose Creek.(Thompson, Charles)
March 1, 2022 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER re #8 Notice of Request for Protection from Court Appearance. The undersigned grants protection from court appearances to Attorney Bonnie Travaglio Hunt for the following time period: April 21, 2022 to May 3, 2022. This Order does not afford protection from any appearance required before the District Court Judge assigned to this case, although she may separately grant such protection. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/1/2022.(kman, )
February 28, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Bonnie Travaglio Hunt for April 21, 2022 to May 3, 2022 (Hunt, Bonnie)
February 25, 2022 Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Warren J. Adair.(Hunt, Bonnie)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/18/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 4/1/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 4/1/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/22/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/23/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/22/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/22/2022, Discovery due by 8/22/2022, Motions due by 10/21/2022, Mediation Due by 9/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 2/25/2022. (dgar)
February 24, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Goose Creek.(Thompson, Charles)
February 20, 2022 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by City of Goose Creek.(dgar)
February 20, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Berkeley County, State of South Carolina, case number 2021-CP-08-02680. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10348203), filed by City of Goose Creek. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(dgar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adair v. City of Goose Creek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren J. Adair
Represented By: Bonnie Travaglio Hunt
Represented By: Peter Moselle Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Goose Creek
Represented By: Bonnie Travaglio Hunt
Represented By: Charles F Thompson, Jr
Represented By: Lake E Summers
Represented By: Peter Moselle Kaufman
Represented By: Michael D Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?