Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Pangalangan et al
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
Rita Pangalangan, Elizabeth Pangalangan-Clyde, Ashley Elaine Pangalangan and Wendi Lawson See |
2:2022cv00727 |
March 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
David C Norton |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Ashley Elaine Pangalangan. (hcor, ) |
Filing 16 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Ashley Elaine Pangalangan byMetropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of J. Derrick Quattlebaum)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 15 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Elizabeth Pangalangan-Clyde. (hcor, ) |
Filing 14 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Rita Pangalangan. (hcor, ) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Ashley Elaine Pangalangan served on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 12 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Elizabeth Pangalangan Clyde byMetropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of J. Derrick Quattlebaum)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT byMetropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of J. Derrick Quattlebaum)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 10 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Wendi Lawson See served on 3/25/2022, answer due 4/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Acceptance of Service)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Elizabeth Pangalangan-Clyde served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Rita Pangalangan served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable David C Norton. Judge Honorable Richard M Gergel no longer assigned to the case. (glev, ) |
Filing 6 Summons (Amended) Reissued as to All Defendants. (sshe, ) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ashley Elaine Pangalangan, Rita Pangalangan, Elizabeth Pangalangan-Clyde, Wendi Lawson See, filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Service due by 6/7/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Insurance, #2 Exhibit B - Death Certificate, #3 Exhibit C - 8.9.19 Statement of Claim, #4 Exhibit D - 9.13.19 Statement of Claim, #5 Exhibit E - See Letter to MetLife, #6 Exhibit F - Twenge Email to MetLife, #7 Exhibit G - MetLife Letters to Solicitor) (Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ashley Elaine Pangalangan, Rita Pangalangan, Elizabeth Pangalangan-Clyde, Wendi Lawson See. (sshe, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.(sshe, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10374320.), filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Service due by 6/6/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Insurance, #2 Exhibit B - Death Certificate, #3 Exhibit C - 8-9-19 Statement of Claim, #4 Exhibit D - 9-13-19 Statement of Claim, #5 Exhibit E - See's Letter to MetLife, #6 Exhibit F - Twenge Email to MetLife, #7 Exhibit G - MetLife Letters to Solicitor)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.