Garvin v. Cohen
| John Garvin |
| Warden LeVern Cohen |
| 2:2022cv00994 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| David C Norton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MOTION for Recusal by John Garvin. Response to Motion due by 6/6/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Envelope) Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Hearing by John Garvin. Response to Motion due by 6/3/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Envelope)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar)
|
|
Filing 10
DUPLICATE Filing fee received re 6 $ 5.00, receipt number SCX200018685. (dgar)
|
|
Filing 9
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Warden LeVern Cohen. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody)
|
|
Filing 8
***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order 2241 SCDC Service, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to John Garvin 355509 Ridgeland Correctional Institution 5 Correctional Road Ridgeland, SC 29936. (dgar)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Service due 6/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 4/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(dgar) Modified on 4/20/2022 to edit docket text(dgar).
|
|
Filing 6
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX200018676. (dgar)
|
|
Filing 4
***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Proper Form Order, and a blank Form AO 240 placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to John Garvin 355509 Ridgeland Correctional Institution 5 Correctional Road Ridgeland, SC 29936. (dgar)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 4/20/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 3/30/2022. (dgar)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John Garvin. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dgar)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garvin v. Cohen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Garvin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden LeVern Cohen | |
| Represented By: | Melody Jane Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
