Coanhe, LTD v. Royal et al
Coanhe, LTD |
Josh Royal, Babe Cover, LLC and Aventus, LLC |
2:2022cv01639 |
May 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (adic, ) (Main Document 7 replaced with corrected document date on 5/31/2022) (adic, ). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Josh Royal. (adic, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Aventus, LLC. (adic, ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Babe Cover, LLC. (adic, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Coanhe, LTD. (adic, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10505975.), filed by Coanhe, LTD. Service due by 8/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Printout of Babe Cover website, #2 Exhibit B - Copy of D529 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - Copy Patent Application, #4 Exhibit D - Copy Copyright Registration, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of C. Henderson, #6 Exhibit F - Print-out from WHOIS records, #7 Exhibit G - Babe Cover Facebook Page, #8 Exhibit H - 12-9-21 Pltff's Letter, #9 Exhibit I - 12-10-21 Royal Email, #10 Exhibit J - Emails Mr. McQuillin, #11 Exhibit K - Babe Cover Product packaging, #12 Exhibit L - Aventus Printout). (adic, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.