Jeter v. Ofc. Cleveland et al
| Joshua Jeter |
| Ofc. Cleveland, Ofc. Prevost, Ofc. Delk, Ofc. Ramp, Ofc. Timmons, Lt. Miguel Cleveland, Lt. Delk, Lt. Douglas, Major Gregg, Lt. Jorge Romero, Warden Stephan, Associate Warden Devine Carter, Associate Warden Frederick, Associate Warden Peeples, Deputy Warden Tamara Collins, Lt. Tiarra Thomas, Brittany Cunningham, Counsel Substitute Rice and Capt. Jones |
| 2:2022cv01651 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Joshua Jeter 314407 Broad River Correctional Institution 4460 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29210. (dgar) |
Filing 12
ORDER re #5 Order 1983. The United States Marshal cannot serve an inadequately identified Defendant, and Plaintiff is herein advised that Defendants Capt. Jones, Lt. Douglas, Ofc. Timmons, and Counsel Substitute Rice may be dismissed as party Defendants if they are not served with process within the requisite 90-day period, by September 15, 2022. Therefore, Plaintiff should provide any additional identification or location information he may have for Defendants Capt. Jones, Lt. Douglas, Ofc. Timmons, and Counsel Substitute Rice without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 7/20/2022. (dgar)
|
| Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted (Restricted Access) by Joshua Jeter as to Capt. Jones, Lt. Douglas, Ofc. Timmons, Counsel Substitute Rice. (dgar) |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order 1983, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Joshua Jeter 314407 Broad River Correctional Institution 4460 Broad River Road Columbia, SC 29210. (dgar) |
|
Filing 7
REFERENCE ORDER #5 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 6/17/2022.(dgar)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Associate Warden Frederick, Associate Warden Peeples, Capt. Jones, Associate Warden Devine Carter, Lt. Miguel Cleveland, Deputy Warden Tamara Collins, Brittany Cunningham, Lt. Delk, Lt. Douglas, Major Gregg, Ofc. Prevost, Ofc. Ramp, Ofc. Timmons, Counsel Substitute Rice, Lt. Jorge Romero, Lt. Tiarra Thomas, Warden Stephan. Service due by 9/15/2022 (dgar) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 6/17/2022. (dgar)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Joshua Jeter. Response to Motion due by 6/8/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ofc. Cleveland, Ofc. Delk, Ofc. Prevost, Ofc. Ramp, Ofc. Timmons, filed by Joshua Jeter. Service due by 8/23/2022 (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Affidavit, #3 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
