Schwartz v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
Nancy Schwartz |
Wells Fargo Bank NA |
2:2022cv02081 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Banks and Banking |
28 U.S.C. § 1367 Federal Receiver Case to Disgorge Profits |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jasmine Kelly Gardner on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank NA (Gardner, Jasmine) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Nancy Schwartz.Reply to Response to Motion due by 8/25/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Maxfield, Dave) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo Bank NA, filed by Nancy Schwartz. Service due by 11/14/2022 (Maxfield, Dave) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Wells Fargo Bank NA. Response to Motion due by 8/19/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - May 5, 2022 Correspondence from Wells Fargo to Plaintiff)No proposed order.(McPherson, Thomas) |
|
Filing 8 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Wells Fargo Bank NA. Response to Motion due by 7/27/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(McPherson, Thomas) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Schwartz.(Maxfield, Dave) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Wells Fargo Bank NA answer due 7/21/2022. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/6/22.(ltap, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Charleston County. (McPherson, Thomas) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by Wells Fargo Bank NA. Response to Motion due by 7/19/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(McPherson, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wells Fargo Bank NA.(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schwartz v. Wells Fargo Bank NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nancy Schwartz | |
Represented By: | Dave Maxfield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA | |
Represented By: | Thomas Richmond McPherson, III |
Represented By: | Jasmine Kelly Gardner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.