Sumter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Stacie Adams Sumter |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
2:2022cv02324 |
July 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Sherri A Lydon |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis along with Pro Se filing instructions placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Stacie Adams Sumter, 1579 Seacroft Road Charleston, SC 29412 (tsim, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Stacie Adams Sumter. (tsim, ) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.02, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 11/17/2022. (tsim, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Stacie Adams Sumter. Response to Motion due by 8/3/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker. (tsim, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Stacie Adams Sumter. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website. (tsim, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/20/2022) (tsim, ). Modified on 7/20/2022 to replace document with the correct document.(tsim, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.