Corey v. Standard Insurance Company
| Stephen Corey |
| Standard Insurance Company |
| 2:2022cv02347 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Joint Local Civil Rule 26.03 Responses and Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Standard Insurance Company.(Tillis, Donna) |
| Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Standard Insurance Company.(Tillis, Donna) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Georgetown County. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Notice of Removal signed by Georgetown County Clerk of Court)(Tillis, Donna) |
| Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 8/15/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 8/29/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 8/29/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/24/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/22/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/22/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/29/2022, Discovery due by 1/23/2023, Motion in Limine must be filed no sooner than fifteen (15) days and no later than ten (10) days prior to the date certain set for jury selection and trial, Motions due by 2/06/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 21 business days prior to jury selection, Pretrial Briefs due by 5 business days prior to the date set for jury selection, Case ready for jury selection and/or trial on or after 5/1/2023 Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 7/25/22. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Stephen Corey.(Bax, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Standard Insurance Company. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Standard Insurance Company.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Standard Insurance Company.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Georgetown County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-22-00503. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10603502), filed by Standard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Premium Summary)(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Corey v. Standard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen Corey | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel W Bax |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Standard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Don Lawrence Kristinik, III |
| Represented By: | Donna Ojetta Tillis |
| Represented By: | Kelly Lynn Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
