Doe v. Town of Mount Pleasnt et al
Plaintiff: Joe Doe
Defendant: Town of Mount Pleasnt, Officer Shawn Fillian and Officers Jane and John Smith 1-6
Case Number: 2:2022cv02365
Filed: July 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2022 Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Town of Mount Pleasnt. (Lindemann, Andrew)
August 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2022 01:30 PM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (hcor, )
August 12, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Response filed by Joe Doe.Reply to Response to Motion due by 8/19/2022 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Phipps, Edward)
July 29, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Town of Mount Pleasnt. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Lindemann, Andrew)
July 27, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Officer Shawn Fillian.(Butler, Drew)
July 22, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Officer Shawn Fillian, Town of Mount Pleasnt.(hcor, )
July 22, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP1002665. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10605693), filed by Officer Shawn Fillian, Town of Mount Pleasnt. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service)(hcor, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Town of Mount Pleasnt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Doe
Represented By: Daniel Scott Slotchiver
Represented By: Edward Lee Phipps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Town of Mount Pleasnt
Represented By: Andrew F Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Shawn Fillian
Represented By: Drew Hamilton Butler
Represented By: James Edward Haarsgaard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officers Jane and John Smith 1-6
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?