Smith v. Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant: Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc., Burger King, Inc., South Carolina State General Assembly Members, Marvin Pendaruis, Wendell Gailyan, Joseph P Riley and Charlie Condon
Case Number: 2:2022cv02637
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION to Compel by Wesley Edward Smith, III. Response to Motion due by 10/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(rweb, )
September 29, 2022 Filing 20 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 19 Transfer of Case Management, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Wesley Edward Smith, III PO Box 294 Moncks Corner, SC 29461 (rweb, )
September 28, 2022 Filing 19 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Honorable David C Norton. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: U. S. District Courthouse 85 Broad Street Charleston, South Carolina 29401. New case number: 2:22-cv-02637-DCN (rweb, )
September 28, 2022 Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #16 Order - 1983 - No Service, #17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Wesley Edward Smith, III, #11 Amended Complaint, filed by Wesley Edward Smith, III placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Wesley Edward Smith, III PO Box 294 Moncks Corner, SC 29461 (rweb, )
September 28, 2022 Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; recommended that the District Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 without further leave to amend and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 10/12/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/28/22. (rweb, )
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 9/28/22. (rweb, )
September 15, 2022 Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wesley Edward Smith, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, )
September 15, 2022 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Burger King, Inc., Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc., South Carolina State General Assembly Members, filed by Wesley Edward Smith, III. Service due by 12/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rweb, )
August 24, 2022 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED blank employment discrimination complaint form placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Wesley Edward Smith, III PO Box 294 Moncks Corner, SC 29461 (rweb, )
August 23, 2022 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order #6 Proper Form Order, 8 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, summons, USM-285 (3 forms) and Pro Se 26.01 answers placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Wesley Edward Smith, III PO Box 294 Moncks Corner, SC 29461 (rweb, )
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 8/23/22.(rweb, )
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER; If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies identified herein, this action will be recommended for summary dismissal, with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and without leave for further amendment. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 32425 (1989); see also Workman v. Morrison Healthcare, No. 17-7621, 2018 WL 2472069, at *1 (4th Cir. June 4, 2018) (explaining where the district court has already afforded a plaintiff with the opportunity to amend, the district court, in its discretion, can either afford plaintiff an additional opportunity to file an amended complaint or dismiss the complaint with prejudice). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 8/23/22. (rweb, )
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PROPER FORM ORDER; Case to be brought into proper form by 9/13/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 8/23/22. (rweb, )
August 10, 2022 Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (rweb, )
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Wesley Edward Smith, III. Response to Motion due by 8/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, )
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burger King, Inc., Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc., South Carolina State General Assembly Members, filed by Wesley Edward Smith, III. Service due by 11/8/2022 (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(rweb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wesley Edward Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolina Franchise Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burger King, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina State General Assembly Members
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marvin Pendaruis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendell Gailyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph P Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlie Condon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?