Berkman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
| Lisa Berkman |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Gotogate, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv02742 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/30/22. (sshe, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement and Motion for Entry of Rubin Order by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Abee, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Lisa Berkman.(Connor, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer due 8/31/2022. (Abee, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP1003174. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10652726).), filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent to Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Filings, #3 Certificate of Service)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
