Salmonsen v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
| Sarah Alisha Salmonsen |
| Wal-Mart Stores East LP doing business as Walmart Supercenter #632 |
| 2:2022cv03215 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ruth Baer on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores East LP (Baer, Laura) |
| Filing 9 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(LaFave, Mary) |
| Filing 8 JOINT Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(LaFave, Mary) |
| Filing 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(LaFave, Mary) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(LaFave, Mary) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(LaFave, Mary) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (cper, ) Modified on 9/23/2022 to replace document (cper, ). |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Sarah Alisha Salmonsen.(cper, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wal-Mart Stores East LP (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10711447) filed by Sarah Alisha Salmonsen. Service due by 12/20/2022(cper, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
