Ahmed v. Mayorkas et al
| Yehia Ahmed Reda M. Ahmed |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and The Manager of U.S.C.I.S. Charleston, South Carolina |
| 2:2022cv03540 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Naturalization Application |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, the proper form documents (a form AO-240, two summons forms, five Forms USM-285, and a pro se partys answers to Local Civil Rule 26.01 (D.S.C.) interrogatories form) placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Yehia Ahmed Reda M. Ahmed 472 Meeting St. Suite C # 309 Charleston, SC 29403. (apsn)
|
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 11/18/2022. (apsn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, The Manager of U.S.C.I.S. Charleston, South Carolina, filed by Yehia Ahmed Reda M. Ahmed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(apsn) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/17/2022) (apsn, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
