Culler v. Lewis et al
Rasheed Culler |
Sheriff Duane Lewis, Berkeley County Sheriffs Office and Neil McSwain |
2:2022cv03609 |
October 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Molly H Cherry |
Richard M Gergel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Rasheed Culler.(Allen, Julian) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Neil McSwain.(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 14 DISCOVERY REPORT by Neil McSwain, Berkeley County Sheriffs Office.(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 13 Rule 26(f) Report by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Neil McSwain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Scheduling Order)(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 12 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 12/21/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 1/4/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 1/4/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/25/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 2/24/2023, Defendants' ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/27/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/26/2023, Discovery due by 5/26/2023, Motions due by 7/26/2023, Mediation Due by 6/26/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 11/30/2022. (apsn) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Neil McSwain.(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER. The Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) is MOOT. On November 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, ECF No. 8, in accordance with this Courts Text Order, ECF No. 6. Accordingly, the Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is Moot. Defendants may answer or otherwise plead in response to the Amended Complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 11/18/2022.(apsn) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Duane Lewis, Neil McSwain, filed by Rasheed Culler. Service due by 2/15/2023 (Allen, Julian) |
Filing 6 Text Order. The parties have informed the Court that they have resolved Defendants partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint, with the appropriate caption and claims in accordance with the parties resolution. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 11/04/2022. (apsn) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Neil McSwain.(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Duane Lewis, Neil McSwain. Response to Motion due by 11/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(Jackson, Robin) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, Duane Lewis, Neil McSwain.(apsn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Berkeley County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP0802329. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10755426), filed by Duane Lewis, Neil McSwain, Berkeley County Sheriffs Office. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.