Belair Electronics, Inc. v. Twelve South, LLC
| Belair Electronics, Inc. |
| Twelve South, LLC |
| 2:2022cv04443 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Twelve South, LLC.(Breazeale, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Twelve South, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration)No proposed order.(Breazeale, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandra Blair Breazeale on behalf of Twelve South, LLC (Breazeale, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT STIPULATION by Twelve South, LLC. (Breazeale, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Belair Electronics, Inc.. Twelve South, LLC served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. (Vanderbloemen, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Timothy J. Haller to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Belair Electronics, Inc. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 12/13/2022.(hcor, )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy J Haller ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10844398) by Belair Electronics, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 12/28/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents PHV Application - Haller, #2 Supporting Documents Certificate of Good Standing - Haller)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Vanderbloemen, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Twelve South, LLC. (hcor, )
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Belair Electronics, Inc..(hcor, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Twelve South, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10838479.), filed by Belair Electronics, Inc.. Service due by 3/8/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No 7941195, #2 Exhibit B - US Patent No 10097676, #3 Exhibit C - Accused Products)(hcor, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Belair Electronics, Inc. v. Twelve South, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Belair Electronics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J Haller |
| Represented By: | Thomas Edward Vanderbloemen |
| Represented By: | Victoria Elizabeth Jaworowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Twelve South, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Blair Breazeale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
