Montez v. Berkeley County Sheriffs Office
| Dontrell Montez Cochran and Berkeley County Sheriffs Office |
| 2:2023cv00016 |
| January 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Dontrell Montez Cochran placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Dontrell Montez Cochran 300 California Ave. Moncks Corner, SC 29461. (dgar) |
Filing 8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned finds that Plaintiff's action is subject to summary dismissal for failure to comply with an order of this Court pursuant to Rule 41(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The undersigned therefore RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice and without further leave to amend or bring this case into proper form, as Plaintiff has already had an opportunity to do so. SeeBritt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 798 (4th Cir. 2022); see also Workman v. Morrison Healthcare, 724 F. Appx. 280, 281 (4th Cir. June 4, 2018). re #1 Complaint filed by Dontrell Montez Cochran. Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 2/27/2023. (dgar)
|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #4 Proper Form Order, a blank summons form, a blank Form USM-285, and a blank prisoner civil rights complaint form placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Dontrell Montez Cochran 300 California Ave. Moncks Corner, SC 29461. (apsn) |
|
Filing 5
REFERENCE ORDER #4 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 01/13/2023.(apsn)
|
|
Filing 4
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 2/3/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 01/13/2023. (apsn)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Dontrell Montez Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Berkeley County Sheriffs Office, filed by Dontrell Montez Cochran.(dgar) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2023: #1 Envelope) (dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montez v. Berkeley County Sheriffs Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dontrell Montez Cochran | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Berkeley County Sheriffs Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
