Oxendine v. Governor, State of South Carolina
Steven W. Oxendine and Steven Wayne Oxendine, |
Governor, State of South Carolina |
2:2023cv00160 |
January 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Gordon Baker |
Sherri A Lydon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Steven W. Oxendine. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT by Steven W. Oxendine to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) |
Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #3 Proper Form Order, blank Form AO 240 and a blank 2254 placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Steven W. Oxendine 383737 Evans Correctional Institution 610 Hwy 9 West Bennettsville, SC 29512. (dgar) |
Filing 3 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 3/2/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 2/9/2023. (dgar) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven W. Oxendine. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Envelope)(apsn) Modified on 3/3/2023 to reference #6 (dgar). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.