Heyward v. Parks et al
| Kavaun Palmer Heyward |
| Christopher D. Parks, Berkeley County Sheriffs Office and Summerville Police Department |
| 2:2023cv00652 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order,the proper form document (a Form USM-285) placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Kavaun Palmer Heyward 8881 Hill Finklea Detention Center 300 California Ave Moncks Corner, SC 29461. (apsn) |
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 4/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Motion #2 granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 03/31/2023. (apsn) Modified on 3/31/2023 to update docket text (apsn).
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kavaun Palmer Heyward. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(apsn) Modified on 3/31/2023 to terminate Motion (apsn). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kavaun Palmer Heyward. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
