Davis, Sr. v. Hanahan Police Department et al
| Esau Demetrius Davis, Sr. |
| Hanahan Police Department, North Charleston Police Department, Al Cannon Detention Center and Wellpath Medical Services |
| 2:2023cv00732 |
| February 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Molly H Cherry |
| David C Norton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 5 Case Reassigned placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Esau Demetrius Davis, Sr. 1497077 Al Cannon Detention Center 3841 Leeds Ave. North Charleston, SC 29405 (bshr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry. Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker no longer assigned to the case. (bshr, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Esau Demetrius Davis, Sr. Response to Motion due by 3/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Al Cannon Detention Center, Hanahan Police Department, North Charleston Police Department, Wellpath Medical Services, filed by Esau Demetrius Davis, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
