Whatley v. Elmore County Probate Office et al
Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley |
Elmore County Probate Office, John Thomton and John Thornton |
2:2023cv00800 |
February 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Paige J Gossett |
Sherri A Lydon |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 STATUS REPORT by Samuel T. Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahil) Modified on 4/19/2023 to correct filing date. (ahil). |
Filing 20 OBJECTION to #17 Report and Recommendation by Samuel T. Whatley. Reply to Objections due by 3/31/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (ahil) |
Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 18 Transfer of Case Management, #15 Order placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Samuel T. Whatley, 579 Folly Road, Unit 14254, Charleston, SC 29422. (dist) |
Filing 18 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Sherri A Lydon. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29201. (dist) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 3/8/2023. (dist) |
Filing 16 Clerk's Notice: #9 Motion to Amend/Correct, #13 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #15 . (dist) |
Filing 15 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 3/8/2023. (dist) |
Filing 13 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Samuel T. Whatley. Response to Motion due by 3/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) Modified on 3/6/2023 to edit docket text (dist). |
Filing 11 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Samuel T. Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendant Name by Samuel T. Whatley. Response to Motion due by 3/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Elmore County Probate Office, John Thornton, filed by Samuel T. Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist) |
Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Samuel T. Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Samuel T. Whatley. Response to Motion due by 3/14/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Elmore County Probate Office, John Thomton, filed by Samuel T. Whatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.