Champayne v. Walmart, Inc. et al
Tonya Champayne |
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart Store No.: 1359 |
2:2023cv01260 |
March 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
David C Norton |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/8/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 6/12/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 6/12/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/10/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/21/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/22/2023, Discovery due by 1/12/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 2/16/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 3/1/2024, Mediation Due by 2/29/2024. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 04/05/2023. (hcor, ) (hcor, ) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc..(hcor, ) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart, Inc.. (hcor, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP1000459. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11022157), filed by Walmart, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.